next up previous notation contents
Next: 1.4 Numerical Round-Off Up: 1 Motivation Previous: 1.2 Implicit Equations

1.3 Relations

Let us turn our attention to a more difficult problem. Consider graphing a relation, such as

figure4575

The procedure taught is to first graph the boundary; the boundary of tex2html_wrap_inline31785 is given by s(x,y) = t(x,y). Our example's boundary is given by

figure4581

We then shade in the appropriate side.

figure4587

It may seem that graphing relations is not much harder than graphing equations, given the simple approach outlined earlier. But consider the two relations

figure4752

Both have the same boundary, which does not break the plane nicely into two ``sides''.

figure4761

The two relations have different graphs, one of which may be given by our side-testing procedure.

figure4843

If this is not troubling enough, consider the relation

figure5004

which, again, has the same boundary as the two earlier relations xy=1 and tex2html_wrap_inline31903 . The graph of this new relation follows:

figure5014

The graph contains all points that satisfy

figure5097

The only true relationship between the boundary of a graph and the actual graph is that of containment: the graph contains its boundary. In the case of strict inequality, the graph does not contain its boundary.

It appears that graphing relations is indeed more difficult than graphing equations. However, this is not the case; consider the following relation:

figure5104

This relation may be expressed as an equation, as follows:

figure5110

We have not chosen a simpler problem: we have, however, illustrated some of its hidden difficulties. These difficulties are nicely illustrated in the next example.

A single graph may contain zero, one, and two-dimensional elements; consider the equation

figure5116

whose graph follows:

figure5124

The graph contains all point which satisfy

figure5206

It seems that the entire idea of generating graphs as collections of lines is fundamentally flawed, as a graph may contain two-dimensional elements. Representing two-dimensional elements with a collection of lines is inefficient at best, and simply unconscionable at worst.


next up previous notation contents
Next: 1.4 Numerical Round-Off Up: 1 Motivation Previous: 1.2 Implicit Equations
Jeff TupperMarch 1996