1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
however, a few potential pitfalls to be avoided in choosing them:
|
![]() |
||||||||
operating point, K=0, rather than at the nominal point itself. such a case. |
Figure 3.24 (a) shows |
![]() |
|||||||
|
![]() |
||||||||
|
When the |
![]() |
|||||||
current state is far from the limit cycle, large control perturbations can result in the |
![]() |
||||||||
biped falling over. |
Including a fall as a sample can lead to a poor model. |
This |
![]() |
||||||
acceptable linear models for our biped models over a wide variety of gaits. |
![]() |