1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
along a circular path. As a result, it turns to face the centre of the circle.
around completely and walk almost straight backwards. The turning perturbation is ineffective in |
![]() |
|||||||||||
the backward walking cases because the model walks primarily on its heels. never obtains sufficient ground reaction forces to fix the foot's orientation. |
As a result, the foot |
![]() |
||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
||||||||||
(a) - F-L sampling |
(b) - L-F sampling |
![]() |
||||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||||
(c) - SP sampling |
![]() |
|||||||||||
Figure 5.7 |
![]() |
|||||||||||
Not all values of |
|
|
|
![]() |
||||||||
perturbation scaling factor still yields smooth behaviour, but not the desired results of Figure 5.7. While this result makes it clear that some care must be taken in choosing parameters, it also serves to illustrate the fact that reasonable choices can often be made without exploring a large parameter |
![]() |