1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3.26, rather than the torso, is sufficient to overcome this problem. |
![]() |
|||||
|
![]() |
|||||
Figure 3.26 - |
![]() |
|||||
Torso servoing ensures that the upper body of the biped remains upright, and provides increased |
![]() |
|||||
stability by damping large upper body movements. |
However, it should be noted that it does |
![]() |
||||
nothing to prevent the biped from falling over since the legs must still support the upper body. An example of a fall with torso servoing applied can be seen in Figure 3.27.
oscillations of the torso (a significant portion of the body mass) results in a successful limit cycle for a larger range of Qd |
![]() |
|||||
|
![]() |
|||||
Figure 3.27 - Falling with torso servoing enabled. |
![]() |