1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135
93 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
(a)
|
|||||||||||||||
Figure 5.18 - Bent-over walking |
|||||||||||||||
Figure 5.18 shows the transitions into and out of the bent-over walk and a few steps of the bent- over walk. Both transitions are performed over two steps, with a different scaling parameter used for each intermediate step. The arm perturbations are included in order to make the biped's arms |
|||||||||||||||
appear to hang by its side in a "natural" position while the body is bent-over. |
In retrospect, a |
||||||||||||||
better approach would be to reduce |
the |
stiffness |
and |
damping |
parameters |
of |
the |
shoulder |
|||||||
actuators, letting physics determine a more appropriate arm position for the walk. |
This would |
||||||||||||||
require variable joint stiffness and damping parameters which are not currently supported. |
|||||||||||||||
5. 5. 3 |
Ducking |
||||||||||||||
By combining the bent-knee and bent-over perturbations with an additional bend of the neck, it is possible to form a relatively simple composite "ducking" perturbation which could potentially be |