1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
93 |
![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||
(a)
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||
Figure 5.18 - Bent-over walking |
![]() |
||||||||||||||
Figure 5.18 shows the transitions into and out of the bent-over walk and a few steps of the bent- over walk. Both transitions are performed over two steps, with a different scaling parameter used for each intermediate step. The arm perturbations are included in order to make the biped's arms |
![]() |
||||||||||||||
appear to hang by its side in a "natural" position while the body is bent-over. |
In retrospect, |
![]() |
|||||||||||||
better approach would be to reduce |
the |
stiffness |
and |
damping |
parameters |
of |
the |
shoulder |
![]() |
||||||
actuators, letting physics determine a more appropriate arm position for the walk. |
This would |
![]() |
|||||||||||||
require variable joint stiffness and damping parameters which are not currently supported. |
![]() |
||||||||||||||
5. 5. 3 |
Ducking |
![]() |
|||||||||||||
By combining the bent-knee and bent-over perturbations with an additional bend of the neck, it is possible to form a relatively simple composite "ducking" perturbation which could potentially be |
![]() |