1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135

57

4.BALANCED WALKING RESULTS


This chapter describes the results of a series of experiments performed using the balance control

approach of Chapter 3. Various parameter choices are explored to determine their importance in

generating successful limit cycles and their effect on the resulting motion.

Control of the human

model is the primary focus of these experiments, although trials using the robo-bird model are

also included to demonstrate success with a significantly different bipedal model.

Sections 4.1,

4.2, and 4.3 present results obtained using each of the three choices of RVs introduced in Section

3.5. Section 4.4 examines the effectiveness of applying a torso servo to the human model.


Figure 4.1 shows a few steps from a typical balanced walk. The motion reaches a limit cycle and

continues to walk in a straight line for the full 60 steps of the trial.

Using the nominal open-loop

control alone results in only 5 steps before the human figure falls over.

The results clearly

demonstrate that with suitable parameter choices, active stabilization of bipedal locomotion cycles

is both possible and useful.

IMAGE Imgs/thesis.final.w696.gif

Figure 4.1 - A sequence of steps from a walking limit cycle.
Up vector-based, Q
d
= [ .25, 0 ], F-L sampling.


The motion resulting from the application of the described balance control varies significantly,

depending on the choice of RVs and other parameter values.

Many choices of parameter values

[CONVERTED BY MYRMIDON]