1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135
3 |
||||||||||||
interest to animators into the realm of real-time performance. |
A second problem, which remains |
|||||||||||
largely unsolved, is often called the control problemof dynamic animation. context of computer animation, the control problem is: |
Briefly stated, in the |
|||||||||||
significant research interest for approximately a decade [AG85] [WB85] [Wil86], it is only now |
||||||||||||
beginning to play a more serious role in commercial computer animation systems. |
A dynamics |
|||||||||||
simulator is now a part of one of the most popular computer animation packages [Alias]. |
The |
|||||||||||
delay is due to both the performance issues and a lack of suitable solutions to the control problem.
|
||||||||||||
1. 3 |
Goals |
|||||||||||
The primary goal of this thesis is to provide a technique for the animation of physically-based |
||||||||||||
bipedal locomotion. |
More specifically, we present a control solution for articulated figures |
|||||||||||
performing cyclic motions such as walking. Aperiodic motions such as sitting down and standing up are not addressed.
|
||||||||||||
must provide some form of ongoing corrective control actions. |
This means that it |
|||||||||||
motions without changes to the basic control structure. |