1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 32
 33
 34
 35
 36
 37
 38
 39
 40
 41
 42
 43
 44
 45
 46
 47
 48
 49
 50
 51
 52
 53
 54
 55
 56
 57
 58
 59
 60
 61
 62
 63
 64
 65
 66
 67
 68
 69
 70
 71
 72
 73
 74
 75
 76
 77
 78
 79
 80
 81
 82
 83
 84
 85
 86
 87
 88
 89
 90
 91
 92
 93
 94
 95
 96
 97
 98
 99
 100
 101
 102
 103
 104
 105
 106
 107
 108
 109
 110
 111
 112
 113
 114
 115
 116
 117
 118
 119
 120
 121
 122
 123
 124
 125
 126
 127
 128
 129
 130
 131
 132
 133
 134
 135
 
| 
		 
 along a circular path. As a result, it turns to face the centre of the circle. 
 around completely and walk almost straight backwards. The turning perturbation is ineffective in  | 
		||||||||||||
| 
		 the backward walking cases because the model walks primarily on its heels. never obtains sufficient ground reaction forces to fix the foot's orientation.  | 
		
		 As a result, the foot  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
		 
		  | 
		
		 
		  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
		 (a) - F-L sampling  | 
		
		 (b) - L-F sampling  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
		 
		  | 
		||||||||||||
| 
		 (c) - SP sampling  | 
		||||||||||||
| 
		 Figure 5.7  | 
		||||||||||||
| 
		 Not all values of   | 
		
		 
  | 
		
		 
  | 
		
		 
  | 
		|||||||||
| 
		 perturbation scaling factor still yields smooth behaviour, but not the desired results of Figure 5.7. While this result makes it clear that some care must be taken in choosing parameters, it also serves to illustrate the fact that reasonable choices can often be made without exploring a large parameter  | 
		||||||||||||