1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135
55 3.26, rather than the torso, is sufficient to overcome this problem. |
||||||
|
||||||
Figure 3.26 -Pelvis-based up vector balance indicator |
||||||
Torso servoing ensures that the upper body of the biped remains upright, and provides increased |
||||||
stability by damping large upper body movements. |
However, it should be noted that it does |
|||||
nothing to prevent the biped from falling over since the legs must still support the upper body. An example of a fall with torso servoing applied can be seen in Figure 3.27.
oscillations of the torso (a significant portion of the body mass) results in a successful limit cycle for a larger range of Qd |
||||||
|
||||||
Figure 3.27 - Falling with torso servoing enabled. |