1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
used to avoid overhead obstacles. |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
model used with the bent-over perturbation. |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
transition
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOF:
|
1 5 |
40 |
3:0 |
20 |
5:0 |
20 |
8:0 |
-52 |
10 -5 |
-42 |
12 -5 |
13 15 |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
S1 |
0 |
-20 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-20 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Figure 5.19 - Composite bent-knee, bent-over and bent-neck perturbation |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Figure 5.20 |
Note |
that |
while |
the |
bent-knee |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
perturbation was originally designed for a slower rate walk which uses speed control, it also works well when applied to a different basic walk (bent-over) without speed control. |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(a)
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Figure 5.20 - Ducking |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
While the ducking perturbation is demonstrated here in an open loop configuration, one can imagine using feedback to provide the biped with the ability to automatically duck under obstacles in its path. |
![]() |